| Title | Contextualizing Premodern Philosophy: Explorations of the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin Traditions |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2023 |
| Publication Place | New York |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, al-Fārābī, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Katja Krause , Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This volume brings together contributions from distinguished scholars in the history of philosophy, focusing on points of interaction between discrete historical contexts, religions, and cultures found within the premodern period. The contributions connect thinkers from antiquity through the Middle Ages and include philosophers from the three major monotheistic faiths—Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. By emphasizing premodern philosophy’s shared textual roots in antiquity, particularly the writings of Plato and Aristotle, the volume highlights points of cross-pollination between different schools, cultures, and moments in premodern thought. Approaching the complex history of the premodern world in an accessible way, the editors organize the volume so as to underscore the difficulties the premodern period poses for scholars, while accentuating the fascinating interplay between the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin philosophical traditions. The contributors cover many topics ranging from the aims of Aristotle’s cosmos, the adoption of Aristotle’s Organon by al-Fārābī, and the origins of the Plotiniana Arabica to the role of Ibn Gabirol’s Fons vitae in the Latin West, the ways in which Islamic philosophy shaped thirteenth-century Latin conceptions of light, Roger Bacon’s adaptation of Avicenna for use in his moral philosophy, and beyond. The volume’s focus on "source-based contextualism" demonstrates an appreciation for the rich diversity of thought found in the premodern period, while revealing methodological challenges raised by the historical study of premodern philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5606","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5606,"authors_free":[{"id":6507,"entry_id":5606,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1684,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Katja Krause","free_first_name":"Katja ","free_last_name":"Krause","norm_person":{"id":1684,"first_name":"Katja","last_name":"Krause","full_name":"Katja Krause","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1077759428","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Katja Krause"}},{"id":6508,"entry_id":5606,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier","free_last_name":" L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Contextualizing Premodern Philosophy: Explorations of the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin Traditions","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Contextualizing Premodern Philosophy: Explorations of the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin Traditions"},"abstract":"This volume brings together contributions from distinguished scholars in the history of philosophy, focusing on points of interaction between discrete historical contexts, religions, and cultures found within the premodern period. The contributions connect thinkers from antiquity through the Middle Ages and include philosophers from the three major monotheistic faiths\u2014Judaism, Islam, and Christianity.\r\n\r\nBy emphasizing premodern philosophy\u2019s shared textual roots in antiquity, particularly the writings of Plato and Aristotle, the volume highlights points of cross-pollination between different schools, cultures, and moments in premodern thought. Approaching the complex history of the premodern world in an accessible way, the editors organize the volume so as to underscore the difficulties the premodern period poses for scholars, while accentuating the fascinating interplay between the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin philosophical traditions. The contributors cover many topics ranging from the aims of Aristotle\u2019s cosmos, the adoption of Aristotle\u2019s Organon by al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b, and the origins of the Plotiniana Arabica to the role of Ibn Gabirol\u2019s Fons vitae in the Latin West, the ways in which Islamic philosophy shaped thirteenth-century Latin conceptions of light, Roger Bacon\u2019s adaptation of Avicenna for use in his moral philosophy, and beyond. The volume\u2019s focus on \"source-based contextualism\" demonstrates an appreciation for the rich diversity of thought found in the premodern period, while revealing methodological challenges raised by the historical study of premodern philosophy.","btype":4,"date":"2023","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1684,"full_name":"Katja Krause","role":1},{"id":1727,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5606,"pubplace":"New York","publisher":"Routledge ","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2023]}
| En el presente artículo se plantea la posibilidad de que el comentario medio de Averroes a la Poética de Aristóteles haya influido en alguna medida en Tomás de Aquino. Esta hipótesis se presenta a partir de los siguientes datos: a) Tomás de Aquino no comentó la Poética, pero sí conoció el comentario medio de Averroes a esta obra; b) Tomás de Aquino entendía la función de la poesía de modo similar a los filósofos árabes, a saber, como un discurso útil para la educación moral; y c) al igual que Averroes, Tomás de Aquino describe el discurso poético allegado al retórico y al dialéctico y, como tal, útil para engendrar convicciones. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5567","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5567,"authors_free":[{"id":6461,"entry_id":5567,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Una posible influencia de Averroes en las referencias a la Po\u00e9tica en Tom\u00e1s de Aquino","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Una posible influencia de Averroes en las referencias a la Po\u00e9tica en Tom\u00e1s de Aquino"},"abstract":"En el presente art\u00edculo se plantea la posibilidad de que el comentario medio de Averroes a la Po\u00e9tica de Arist\u00f3teles haya influido en alguna medida en Tom\u00e1s de Aquino. Esta hip\u00f3tesis se presenta a partir de los siguientes datos: a) Tom\u00e1s de Aquino no coment\u00f3 la Po\u00e9tica, pero s\u00ed conoci\u00f3 el comentario medio de Averroes a esta obra; b) Tom\u00e1s de Aquino entend\u00eda la funci\u00f3n de la poes\u00eda de modo similar a los fil\u00f3sofos \u00e1rabes, a saber, como un discurso \u00fatil para la educaci\u00f3n moral; y c) al igual que Averroes, Tom\u00e1s de Aquino describe el discurso po\u00e9tico allegado al ret\u00f3rico y al dial\u00e9ctico y, como tal, \u00fatil para engendrar convicciones.\r\n","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"},{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"}],"authors":[{"id":1727,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5567,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Iztapalapa","volume":"26","issue":"58","pages":"51-62"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 89–102 |
| Categories | Ibn Bāǧǧa, Aquinas, Albert |
| Author(s) | Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Albert’s De anima III, 3, chapters 6–11 there is a discussion on whether the human intellect is able to apprehend only forms abstracted from matter or whether it is possible for it to know something separated from magnitude. If the human intellect is able to understand separate forms, this would mean that some forms are not apprehended with phantasms and magnitude but by the conjunction of the possible intellect and the separate intellect. This matter is quite problematic since it is not clear enough whether separate forms are known through the perfect conjunction of the possible intellect and the agent intellect or by means of the agent intellect which acts both as efficient and formal cause of these forms. Here, I focus on chapter 8 where Albert criticizes Avempace’s doctrine of the intellect, and chapter 11 where he states a resolution to the problem, which is very close to that of Averroes. This exploration illustrates the complexity of the relationship between the philosophies of Albert and Averroes. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2015","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2015,"authors_free":[{"id":6121,"entry_id":2015,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier,","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms"},"abstract":"In Albert\u2019s De anima III, 3, chapters 6\u201311 there is a discussion on whether the human intellect is able to apprehend only forms abstracted from matter or whether it is possible for it to know something separated from magnitude. If the human intellect is able to understand separate forms, this would mean that some forms are not apprehended with phantasms and magnitude but by the conjunction of the possible intellect and the separate intellect. This matter is quite problematic since it is not clear enough whether separate forms are known through the perfect conjunction of the possible intellect and the agent intellect or by means of the agent intellect which acts both as efficient and formal cause of these forms. Here, I focus on chapter 8 where Albert criticizes Avempace\u2019s doctrine of the intellect, and chapter 11 where he states a resolution to the problem, which is very close to that of Averroes. This exploration illustrates the complexity of the relationship between the philosophies of Albert and Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"}],"authors":[{"id":1727,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2015,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association","volume":"86","issue":"2","pages":"89\u2013102"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 89–102 |
| Categories | Ibn Bāǧǧa, Aquinas, Albert |
| Author(s) | Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Albert’s De anima III, 3, chapters 6–11 there is a discussion on whether the human intellect is able to apprehend only forms abstracted from matter or whether it is possible for it to know something separated from magnitude. If the human intellect is able to understand separate forms, this would mean that some forms are not apprehended with phantasms and magnitude but by the conjunction of the possible intellect and the separate intellect. This matter is quite problematic since it is not clear enough whether separate forms are known through the perfect conjunction of the possible intellect and the agent intellect or by means of the agent intellect which acts both as efficient and formal cause of these forms. Here, I focus on chapter 8 where Albert criticizes Avempace’s doctrine of the intellect, and chapter 11 where he states a resolution to the problem, which is very close to that of Averroes. This exploration illustrates the complexity of the relationship between the philosophies of Albert and Averroes. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2015","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2015,"authors_free":[{"id":6121,"entry_id":2015,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier,","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms"},"abstract":"In Albert\u2019s De anima III, 3, chapters 6\u201311 there is a discussion on whether the human intellect is able to apprehend only forms abstracted from matter or whether it is possible for it to know something separated from magnitude. If the human intellect is able to understand separate forms, this would mean that some forms are not apprehended with phantasms and magnitude but by the conjunction of the possible intellect and the separate intellect. This matter is quite problematic since it is not clear enough whether separate forms are known through the perfect conjunction of the possible intellect and the agent intellect or by means of the agent intellect which acts both as efficient and formal cause of these forms. Here, I focus on chapter 8 where Albert criticizes Avempace\u2019s doctrine of the intellect, and chapter 11 where he states a resolution to the problem, which is very close to that of Averroes. This exploration illustrates the complexity of the relationship between the philosophies of Albert and Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"}],"authors":[{"id":1727,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2015,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association","volume":"86","issue":"2","pages":"89\u2013102"}},"sort":["Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms"]}
| Title | Contextualizing Premodern Philosophy: Explorations of the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin Traditions |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2023 |
| Publication Place | New York |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, al-Fārābī, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Katja Krause , Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This volume brings together contributions from distinguished scholars in the history of philosophy, focusing on points of interaction between discrete historical contexts, religions, and cultures found within the premodern period. The contributions connect thinkers from antiquity through the Middle Ages and include philosophers from the three major monotheistic faiths—Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. By emphasizing premodern philosophy’s shared textual roots in antiquity, particularly the writings of Plato and Aristotle, the volume highlights points of cross-pollination between different schools, cultures, and moments in premodern thought. Approaching the complex history of the premodern world in an accessible way, the editors organize the volume so as to underscore the difficulties the premodern period poses for scholars, while accentuating the fascinating interplay between the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin philosophical traditions. The contributors cover many topics ranging from the aims of Aristotle’s cosmos, the adoption of Aristotle’s Organon by al-Fārābī, and the origins of the Plotiniana Arabica to the role of Ibn Gabirol’s Fons vitae in the Latin West, the ways in which Islamic philosophy shaped thirteenth-century Latin conceptions of light, Roger Bacon’s adaptation of Avicenna for use in his moral philosophy, and beyond. The volume’s focus on "source-based contextualism" demonstrates an appreciation for the rich diversity of thought found in the premodern period, while revealing methodological challenges raised by the historical study of premodern philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5606","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5606,"authors_free":[{"id":6507,"entry_id":5606,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1684,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Katja Krause","free_first_name":"Katja ","free_last_name":"Krause","norm_person":{"id":1684,"first_name":"Katja","last_name":"Krause","full_name":"Katja Krause","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1077759428","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Katja Krause"}},{"id":6508,"entry_id":5606,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier","free_last_name":" L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Contextualizing Premodern Philosophy: Explorations of the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin Traditions","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Contextualizing Premodern Philosophy: Explorations of the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin Traditions"},"abstract":"This volume brings together contributions from distinguished scholars in the history of philosophy, focusing on points of interaction between discrete historical contexts, religions, and cultures found within the premodern period. The contributions connect thinkers from antiquity through the Middle Ages and include philosophers from the three major monotheistic faiths\u2014Judaism, Islam, and Christianity.\r\n\r\nBy emphasizing premodern philosophy\u2019s shared textual roots in antiquity, particularly the writings of Plato and Aristotle, the volume highlights points of cross-pollination between different schools, cultures, and moments in premodern thought. Approaching the complex history of the premodern world in an accessible way, the editors organize the volume so as to underscore the difficulties the premodern period poses for scholars, while accentuating the fascinating interplay between the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin philosophical traditions. The contributors cover many topics ranging from the aims of Aristotle\u2019s cosmos, the adoption of Aristotle\u2019s Organon by al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b, and the origins of the Plotiniana Arabica to the role of Ibn Gabirol\u2019s Fons vitae in the Latin West, the ways in which Islamic philosophy shaped thirteenth-century Latin conceptions of light, Roger Bacon\u2019s adaptation of Avicenna for use in his moral philosophy, and beyond. The volume\u2019s focus on \"source-based contextualism\" demonstrates an appreciation for the rich diversity of thought found in the premodern period, while revealing methodological challenges raised by the historical study of premodern philosophy.","btype":4,"date":"2023","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1684,"full_name":"Katja Krause","role":1},{"id":1727,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5606,"pubplace":"New York","publisher":"Routledge ","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Contextualizing Premodern Philosophy: Explorations of the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin Traditions"]}
| En el presente artículo se plantea la posibilidad de que el comentario medio de Averroes a la Poética de Aristóteles haya influido en alguna medida en Tomás de Aquino. Esta hipótesis se presenta a partir de los siguientes datos: a) Tomás de Aquino no comentó la Poética, pero sí conoció el comentario medio de Averroes a esta obra; b) Tomás de Aquino entendía la función de la poesía de modo similar a los filósofos árabes, a saber, como un discurso útil para la educación moral; y c) al igual que Averroes, Tomás de Aquino describe el discurso poético allegado al retórico y al dialéctico y, como tal, útil para engendrar convicciones. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5567","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5567,"authors_free":[{"id":6461,"entry_id":5567,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Una posible influencia de Averroes en las referencias a la Po\u00e9tica en Tom\u00e1s de Aquino","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Una posible influencia de Averroes en las referencias a la Po\u00e9tica en Tom\u00e1s de Aquino"},"abstract":"En el presente art\u00edculo se plantea la posibilidad de que el comentario medio de Averroes a la Po\u00e9tica de Arist\u00f3teles haya influido en alguna medida en Tom\u00e1s de Aquino. Esta hip\u00f3tesis se presenta a partir de los siguientes datos: a) Tom\u00e1s de Aquino no coment\u00f3 la Po\u00e9tica, pero s\u00ed conoci\u00f3 el comentario medio de Averroes a esta obra; b) Tom\u00e1s de Aquino entend\u00eda la funci\u00f3n de la poes\u00eda de modo similar a los fil\u00f3sofos \u00e1rabes, a saber, como un discurso \u00fatil para la educaci\u00f3n moral; y c) al igual que Averroes, Tom\u00e1s de Aquino describe el discurso po\u00e9tico allegado al ret\u00f3rico y al dial\u00e9ctico y, como tal, \u00fatil para engendrar convicciones.\r\n","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"},{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"}],"authors":[{"id":1727,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5567,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Iztapalapa","volume":"26","issue":"58","pages":"51-62"}},"sort":["Una posible influencia de Averroes en las referencias a la Po\u00e9tica en Tom\u00e1s de Aquino"]}